Asian Journal of Research and Reports in Neurology

Assessment of Attention in Real Classroom Environment: An EEG Based Study

Swati Agrawal

Learning Cart Digital Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Sagar Chaturvedi

Learning Cart Digital Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Jyoti Gupta

Learning Cart Digital Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Shakhzoda Bahtiyarovna Akhmedova

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Social Sciences, Samarkand State University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.

Azizuddin Khan *

Learning Cart Digital Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India and Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Psychophysiology Laboratory, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai- Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

Attention is a critical factor for academic success in the classroom environment. However, any interruption or distraction can significantly affect students' attention levels. The fundamental challenge for both classroom and online learning is to maintain attention amid distractions or interruptions. The present study is an attempt to assess attention levels in the classroom setting by using EEG on twenty four students.

Objectives: The study assesses the students’ attentiveness in the presence of distractions introduced through the external interruptions during academic lectures and compares distraction-free and manually distracted lectures.

Methods: Pre-frontal EEG powers are utilized to determine the student’s attention index. The significance of attention level variation from non-distracted to distracted lecture and vice versa is tested using one-sample T test at the significance level p<0.05.

Results: Our approach found statistically significant variation in students’ attention during a classroom lecture, when they are manually distracted. The findings reveal that the attention level of students during classroom lectures is affected by distractions and it enhances or deteriorates for different individuals.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the effect of distractions be considered when assessing students' attention. It also suggests that using distraction during a lecture can provide useful information about a student's attention profile. Students' attention is assessed in this manner for detailed profiling to assist teachers in understanding their cognitive processes and needs. However, the approaches described above are not appropriate for virtual learning environments and can be overwhelming when attempting to understand each student's learning style and academic abilities.

Keywords: Attention profile, distraction, interruption, learning style, and prefrontal cortex

---

---

---

References

Gallen CL, Schaerlaeken S, Younger JW, Younger JW, O’Laughlin KD, Anguera JA, Bunge SA, Ferrer EE, Hoeft F, McCandliss BD, Mishra J, Rosenberg-Lee M, Gazzaley A, Uncapher MR, Anguera JA, Gazzaley A. Contribution of sustained attention abilities to real-world academic skills in children. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):1–11. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29427-w

Ko LW, Komarov O, Hairston WD, Jung TP, Lin CT. Sustained attention in real classroom settings: An EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2017:1–10 Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00388

Lodge JM, Harrison WJ. The role of attention in learning in the digital age. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 2019;92(1):21–28.

Zickerick B, Thönes S, Kobald SO, Wascher E, Schneider D, Küper K. Differential Effects of Interruptions and Distractions on Working Memory Processes in an ERP Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020;1–13. Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00084

Demirbilek M, Talan T. The effect of social media multitasking on classroom performance. Active Learning in Higher Education. 201819(2):117–129. Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721382

May KE, & Elder AD. Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2018;15(1). Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z

Wang C. Comprehensively Summarizing What Distracts Students from Online Learning: A Literature Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies; 2022.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1483531

Wetzel N, Widmann A, Scharf F. Distraction of attention by novel sounds in children declines fast. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1–13. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83528-y

Lindsay GW. Attention in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Machine Learning. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2020;1–21. Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2020.00029

Lehman B, D’Mello S., Strain A, Mills C, Gross M, Dobbins A, Wallace P, Millis K, Graesser A. Inducing and Tracking Confusion with Contradictions during Complex Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2013;22 (1–2):85–105. Available:https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-130025

Baker RSJd, D’Mello SK, Rodrigo MMT, Graesser AC. Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2010;68(4):223–241. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2009.12.003

Yan Z. Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020;45(2):224–238.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390

Blotenberg I, Schmidt-Atzert L. Towards a process model of sustained attention tests. Journal of Intelligence. 2019;7(1). Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010003

Hamadicharef B, Zhang H, Guan C, Wang C, Kok SP, Keng PT, Kai KA. Learning EEG-based spectral-spatial patterns for attention level measurement. Proceedings - IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 2009:1465–1468. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2009.5118043

Horschig JM, Oosterheert W, Oostenveld R, Jensen O. Modulation of Posterior Alpha Activity by Spatial Attention Allows for Controlling A Continuous Brain–Computer Interface. Brain Topography. 2015;28(6):852–864. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0401-7

Liu NH, Chiang CY, Chu HC. Recognizing the degree of human attention using EEG signals from mobile sensors. Sensors (Switzerland). 2013;13(8):10273–10286. Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810273

Ergenoglu T, Demiralp T, Bayraktaroglu Z, Ergen M, Beydagi H, Uresin Y. Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans. Cognitive Brain Research. 2004;20(3): 376–383.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres. 2004.03.009

Kelly SP, Dockree P, Reilly RB, Robertson IH. EEG alpha power and coherence time courses in a sustained attention task. International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NER. 2003:83–86. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2003.1196761

Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 1999;29(2–3):169–195.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3

Uusberg A, Uibo H, Kreegipuu K, Allik J. EEG alpha and cortical inhibition in affective attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2013 89(1):26–36. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPSYCHO.2013.04.020

Bauer M, Stenner MP, Friston KJ, Dolan RJ. Attentional modulation of alpha/beta and gamma oscillations reflect functionally distinct processes. Journal of Neuroscience. 201434(48):16117–16125.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3474-13.2014

Haegens S, Cousijn H, Wallis G, Harrison PJ, Nobre AC. Inter- and intra-individual variability in alpha peak frequency. NeuroImage. 2014;92:46–55. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2014.01.049

Al-Nafjan A, Aldayel M. Predict Students’ Attention in Online Learning Using EEG Data. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2022;14 m(11):1–12. Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116553

Fahimi F, Goh WB, Lee TS, Guan C. Neural indexes of attention extracted from EEG correlate with elderly reaction time in response to an attentional task. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; 2018. Available:https://doi.org/10.1145/3265689.3265722

Jin CY, Borst JP, Vugt, M. K. Van. Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG; 2019.

Rajan A, Siegel SN, Liu Y, Bengson J, Mangun GR, Ding M. Theta oscillations index frontal decision-making and mediate reciprocal frontal-parietal interactions in willed Attention. Cerebral Cortex. 2019;29 (7):2832–2843. Available:https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy149

Toa CK, Sim KS, Tan SC. Electroencephalogram-based attention level classification using convolution attention memory neural network. IEEE Access. 2021;9:58870–58881. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072731

Wan W, Cui X, Gao Z, Gu Z. Frontal EEG-Based Multi-Level Attention States Recognition Using Dynamical Complexity and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2021:1–14. Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.673955

Szafir D, Mutlu B. Pay attention! Designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings. 2012:11–20.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207679

Morales S, Bowers ME. Time-frequency analysis methods and their application in developmental EEG data. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2022;54:101067 Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101067

Nagaraj NK. Effect of Auditory Distraction on Working Memory, Attention Switching, and Listening Comprehension. Audiology Research. 2021;11(2):227–243.

Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11020021

Wyss NM, Kannass KN, Haden CA. The effects of distraction on cognitive task performance during toddlerhood. Infancy, 201318(4):604–628. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00128.x